|
The charges against Samuel Erinle of London
were:
Mr Erinle conducted himself and a matter of
which he had conduct in such a manner as brought disrepute upon the
Institute or its Members and failed to work within the framework of
the law contrary to Paragraph 1(1) and 3 of the of the Code of
Conduct of the Institute of Legal Executives.
The particulars to this charge were that on a
date or dates unknown between 1st December 2006 and 19th August
2008 Samuel Erinle, a student member of ILEX, whilst then engaged
in or employed by a business trading under the style “SBA
Consultants”, alternatively “SBA Legal Services”, alternatively
“SBA Solicitors”, provided or assisted in the provision of
immigration advice or services to a client, A, whilst not qualified
to do so by law.
Mr Erinle conducted himself and a matter of
which he had conduct in such a manner as brought disrepute upon the
Institute or its Members and failed to work within the framework of
the law contrary to Paragraph 1(1) and 3 of the Code of Conduct of
the Institute of Legal Executives.
The particulars to this charge were that on a
date or dates unknown between 1st December 2007 and 31st December
2007 Samuel Erinle, a student member of ILEX, whilst engaged in or
employed by a business trading under the style “SBA Consultants”,
alternatively “SBA Legal Services”, alternatively “SBA Solicitors”,
provided or assisted in the provision of immigration advice or
services to a client, B, whilst not qualified to do so by law.
Mr Erinle conducted himself and a matter of
which he had conduct in such a manner as brought disrepute upon the
Institute or its Members contrary to Paragraph 1(1) of the Code of
Conduct of the Institute of Legal Executives.
The particulars to this charge were that on or
about 19 December 2007 Samuel Erinle, a student member of ILEX,
made a written declaration used or intended to be used in
proceedings before the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal that he was
not prohibited from providing immigration advice and services by
Section 84 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 and was
authorised to practice by a designated professional body or
supervised by such a person, when in fact he was so prohibited and
was not so authorised.
|