[skip to content]

ILEX has called for the rest of the justice system to undergo the same level of change that legal aid lawyers are facing.

Responding to the Ministry of Justice's consultation on legal aid funding reform, The Institute of Legal Executives (ILEX) has said a key reform would be better integration of all the relevant participants in the justice process. 'There is a need to tackle inefficiencies in the system: for example, inefficiencies in the Court Service, at police stations, the Crown Prosecution Service, social services and the Legal Services Commission.'

On a related point, ILEX called on the government to recognise the importance of greater communication and integration between all agencies involved in the charging process:

'The consultation paper fails to give a firm commitment in reviewing and tackling these wider inefficiencies in the system,' it said. 'It is wholly unfair to expect the legal profession to make significant changes to its practices without similar commitments from the other participants of the justice system. This reinforces the view of practitioners that the legal aid sector is being disproportionately penalised for inefficiencies in the system as a whole.

'For example, practitioner feedback indicates that the Crown Court suffers from weak cases arriving because scrutiny in the magistrates' court no longer takes place. Cuts are diminishing the capacity to represent and defend people and eroding the processes of criminal justice.'

The consultation paper hinted at the possibility of ring-fenced budgets, and subsequently the ministry instituted a review into the delivery of legal aid that will directly address this question.

'ILEX agrees in principle with a ring-fenced legal aid budget for both crime and civil,' the response said. 'Notwithstanding that, ILEX is of the view that the government cannot control a criminal legal aid budget that is essentially demand led.

ILEX is not convinced at the utility of dipping into the criminal budget to enable extra cash to be made available for the civil budget, without any long-term strategy in place. This is not the best way forward to run a sustainable system of legal aid.'

The response said the decision to prioritise one area of legal aid at the expense of another 'appears to be no more than a political decision'; the reality, it continued, is that in any recession there is invariably an increase in social deprivation matched by a corresponding increase in criminal activity.

Posted 07.01.10